日本厚蛤屬












































日本厚蛤屬

科学分类 编辑
界：
动物界 Animalia
门：
軟體動物門 Mollusca
纲：
双壳纲 Bivalvia
亚纲：
異齒亞綱 Heterodonta
下纲：
始异齿下纲 Archiheterodonta
目：
心蛤目 Carditoida
总科：
厚蛤總科 Crassatelloidea
科：
厚蛤科 Crassatellidae
属：
日本厚蛤屬 Nipponocrassatella
Kuroda & Habe in Kuroda et al., 1971


日本厚蛤屬（學名： Nipponocrassatella）為黑田德米及波部忠重於1971年所命名的屬，是心蛤目厚蛤科[1]之下一個微小貝的屬，其物種舊屬厚蛤屬及真厚蛤屬[2]，原是這兩個屬的亞屬。



物種




  • 扁厚蛤 Nipponocrassatella adamsi (Kobelt, 1886)[3]


  • 日本真厚壳蛤 Nipponocrassatella japonica (Dunker, 1882)[4][5][6][7]


  • 小真厚壳蛤 Nipponocrassatella nana (A. Adams & Reeve, 1850)[8]：即Eucrassatella (Nipponocrassatella) nanus[1]，又名簾藻鹽貝。



参考文献





  1. ^ 1.01.1 Wu, W. L. The List of Taiwan Bivalve Fauna [台灣雙殼軟體動物目錄]. Quarterly Journal of the Taiwan Museum. 1980, 33 (1&2): 55–208 （英语）. 


  2. ^ WoRMS. Nipponocrassatella Kuroda & Habe in Kuroda et al., 1971. World Register of Marine Species. [2017-09-10]. 


  3. ^ WoRMS. Nipponocrassatella adamsi (Kobelt, 1886). World Register of Marine Species. [2017-09-11]. 


  4. ^ 国际贝库：日本真厚壳蛤. 台湾贝类资料库. [2017-09-09]. 


  5. ^ 波部忠重. 日本產軟體動物分類學二枚貝綱，掘足綱. 日本: 保育社. 1977 （日语）. 


  6. ^ Kuroda, T.; Habe, T. A catalogue of Mollusca of Wakayama Pref. the Prov. of Kii. I. Bivalvia, Scaphopoda and Cephalopoda. 1981: 1–301 （英语）. 


  7. ^ WoRMS. Nipponocrassatella japonica (Dunker, 1882). World Register of Marine Species. [2017-09-11]. 


  8. ^ WoRMS. Nipponocrassatella nana (Adams & Reeve, 1850). World Register of Marine Species. [2017-09-11]. 




外部連結





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Information security

Image
This article is part of a series on Information security Related security categories Internet security Cyberwarfare Computer security Mobile security Network security Threats Computer crime Vulnerability Eavesdropping Malware Spyware Ransomware Trojans Viruses Worms Rootkits Bootkits Keyloggers Screen scrapers Exploits Backdoors Logic bombs Payloads Denial of service Defenses Computer access control Application security Antivirus software Secure coding Secure by default Secure by design Secure operating systems Authentication Multi-factor authentication Authorization Data-centric security Encryption Firewall Intrusion detection system Mobile secure gateway Runtime application self-protection (RASP) v t e Information security , sometimes shortened to InfoSec , is the practice of preventing unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, inspection, recording or destruction of information. Th
Read more

Lambak Kiri

Image
For Lambak Kiri public housing area, see Lambak Kiri Landless Indigenous Citizens' Housing Scheme. Village in Brunei-Muara, Brunei Lambak Kiri Village Location in Brunei Coordinates: 4°59′26″N 114°57′04″E  /  4.990472°N 114.951114°E  / 4.990472; 114.951114 Coordinates: 4°59′26″N 114°57′04″E  /  4.990472°N 114.951114°E  / 4.990472; 114.951114 Country Brunei District Brunei-Muara Mukim Berakas A Government  • Village head Hamdani Omar Postcode BB1214 Lambak Kiri is a populated place in Brunei-Muara District, Brunei. It is officially a village subdivision under Berakas A, a mukim in the district. Lambak Kiri may also refer to the greater area which includes the Lambak Kiri public housing area of the Landless Indigenous Citizens' Housing Scheme (Malay: Skim Tanah Kurnia Rakyat Jati ), although the latter is a separate subdivision. Contents 1 Name 2 Administration 3 See also 4 References Name
Read more

Farm Security Administration

Image
Farm Security Administration Farm Security Administration logo Agency overview Formed September 1, 1937  ( 1937-09-01 ) Preceding agencies Resettlement Administration Federal Emergency Relief Administration Dissolved 1946 Superseding agency Farmers Home Administration Key documents Farm Security Act Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act The Farm Security Administration ( FSA ) was a New Deal agency created in 1937 to combat rural poverty during the Great Depression in the United States. It succeeded the Resettlement Administration (1935–1937). [1] The FSA stressed "rural rehabilitation" efforts to improve the lifestyle of sharecroppers, tenants, very poor landowning farmers, and a program to purchase submarginal land owned by poor farmers and resettle them in group farms on land more suitable for efficient farming. Critics, including the Farm Bureau, strongly opposed the FSA as an experiment in collectivizing agriculture—that is, in bringing
Read more