Crab Nebula

Crab Nebula

Supernova remnant
Hubble Space Telescope mosaic image assembled from 24 individual Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 exposures taken in October 1999, January 2000, and December 2000
Observation data: J2000.0 epoch
Right ascension	05h 34m 31.94s[1]
Declination	+22° 00′ 52.2″[1]
Distance	7003650000000000000♠6500±1600 ly   (7003200000000000000♠2000±500[2] pc)
Apparent magnitude (V)	+8.4
Apparent dimensions (V)	420″ × 290″[3][b]
Constellation	Taurus
Physical characteristics
Radius	~5.5 ly   (~1.7[4] pc)
Absolute magnitude (V)	7000310000000000000♠−3.1±0.5[c]
Notable features	Optical pulsar
Designations	Messier 1, NGC 1952, Taurus A, Sh2-244[1]
See also: Lists of nebulae

The Crab Nebula (catalogue designations M1, NGC 1952, Taurus A) is a supernova remnant in the constellation of Taurus. The now-current name is due to William Parsons, who observed the object in 1840 using a 36-inch telescope and produced a drawing that looked somewhat like a crab.^[5] Corresponding to a bright supernova recorded by Chinese astronomers in 1054, the nebula was observed later by English astronomer John Bevis in 1731. The nebula was the first astronomical object identified with a historical supernova explosion.

At an apparent magnitude of 8.4, comparable to that of Saturn's moon Titan, it is not visible to the naked eye but can be made out using binoculars under favourable conditions. The nebula lies in the Perseus Arm of the Milky Way galaxy, at a distance of about 2.0 kiloparsecs (6,500 ly) from Earth. It has a diameter of 3.4 parsecs (11 ly), corresponding to an apparent diameter of some 7 arcminutes, and is expanding at a rate of about 1,500 kilometres per second (930 mi/s), or 0.5% of the speed of light.

At the center of the nebula lies the Crab Pulsar, a neutron star 28–30 kilometres (17–19 mi) across with a spin rate of 30.2 times per second,^[6] which emits pulses of radiation from gamma rays to radio waves. At X-ray and gamma ray energies above 30 keV, the Crab Nebula is generally the brightest persistent source in the sky, with measured flux extending to above 10 TeV. The nebula's radiation allows for the detailed studying of celestial bodies that occult it. In the 1950s and 1960s, the Sun's corona was mapped from observations of the Crab Nebula's radio waves passing through it, and in 2003, the thickness of the atmosphere of Saturn's moon Titan was measured as it blocked out X-rays from the nebula.

The inner part of the nebula is a much smaller pulsar wind nebula that appears as a shell surrounding the pulsar. Some sources consider the Crab Nebula to be an example of both a pulsar wind nebula as well as a supernova remnant,^[7] while others separate the two phenomena based on the different sources of energy production and behaviour.^[4] For the Crab Nebula, the divisions are superficial but remain meaningful to researchers and their lines of study.^{[citation needed]}

Contents

• 
  1 Observational history
  
  
  
  • 
    1.1 First identification
    
  
  
  • 
    1.2 Connection to SN 1054
    
  
  
  • 
    1.3 Crab Pulsar
    
  
  
  
  


• 
  2 Physical conditions
  
  
  
  • 
    2.1 Distance
    
  
  
  • 
    2.2 Mass
    
  
  
  • 
    2.3 Helium-rich torus
    
  
  
  
  


• 
  3 Central star
  


• 
  4 Progenitor star
  


• 
  5 Transits by Solar System bodies
  
  
  
  • 
    5.1 Lunar
    
  
  
  • 
    5.2 Solar
    
  
  
  • 
    5.3 Other objects
    
  
  
  
  


• 
  6 Gallery
  


• 
  7 See also
  


• 
  8 Notes
  


• 
  9 References
  


• 
  10 External links
  

Observational history

HaRGB image of the Crab Nebula from the Liverpool Telescope, exposures totalling 1.4 hours.

Further information: SN 1054

Modern understanding that the Crab Nebula was created by a supernova traces back to 1921, when Carl Otto Lampland announced he had seen changes in its structure.^[8] This eventually led to the conclusion that the creation of the Crab Nebula corresponds to the bright SN 1054 supernova recorded by Chinese astronomers in AD 1054.^[9] There is a 13th-century Japanese reference to this "guest star" in Meigetsuki.^[10][11]

The event was long considered unrecorded in Islamic astronomy,^[12] but in 1978 a reference was found in a 13th-century copy made by Ibn Abi Usaibia of a work by Ibn Butlan, a Nestorian Christian physician active in Baghdad at the time of the supernova.^[13][14]

First identification

Reproduction of the first depiction of the nebula by Lord Rosse (1844) (colour-inverted to appear white-on-black)

The Crab Nebula was first identified in 1731 by John Bevis.^[15] The nebula was independently rediscovered in 1758 by Charles Messier as he was observing a bright comet.^[15] Messier catalogued it as the first entry in his catalogue of comet-like objects;^[15] in 1757, Alexis Clairaut reexamined the calculations of Edmund Halley and predicted the return of Halley's Comet in late 1758. The exact time of the comet's return required the consideration of perturbations to its orbit caused by planets in the Solar System such as Jupiter, which Clairaut and his two colleagues Jérôme Lalande and Nicole-Reine Lepaute carried out more precisely than Halley, finding that the comet should appear in the constellation of Taurus. It is in searching in vain for the comet that Charles Messier found the Crab nebula, which he at first thought to be Halley's comet.^[16] After some observation, noticing that the object that he was observing was not moving across the sky, Messier concluded that the object was not a comet. Messier then realised the usefulness of compiling a catalogue of celestial objects of a cloudy nature, but fixed in the sky, to avoid incorrectly cataloguing them as comets.^[16]

William Herschel observed the Crab Nebula numerous times between 1783 and 1809, but it is not known whether he was aware of its existence in 1783, or if he discovered it independently of Messier and Bevis. After several observations, he concluded that it was composed of a group of stars.^[17] The 3rd Earl of Rosse observed the nebula at Birr Castle in 1844 using a 36-inch (0.9 m) telescope, and referred to the object as the "Crab Nebula" because a drawing he made of it looked like a crab. He observed it again later, in 1848, using a 72-inch (1.8 m) telescope and could not confirm the supposed resemblance, but the name stuck nevertheless.^[18][19]

Connection to SN 1054

The nebula is seen in the visible spectrum at 550 nm (green light).

In 1913, when Vesto Slipher registered his spectroscopy study of the sky, the Crab Nebula was again one of the first objects to be studied. In the early twentieth century, the analysis of early photographs of the nebula taken several years apart revealed that it was expanding. Tracing the expansion back revealed that the nebula must have become visible on Earth about 900 years ago. Historical records revealed that a new star bright enough to be seen in the daytime had been recorded in the same part of the sky by Chinese astronomers in 1054.^[17][20]

Changes in the cloud, suggesting its small extent, were discovered by Carl Lampland in 1921.^[8] That same year, John Charles Duncan demonstrated that the remnant is expanding,^[21] while Knut Lundmark noted its proximity to the guest star of 1054.^[20][22]

In 1928, Edwin Hubble proposed associating the cloud to the star of 1054, an idea which remained controversial until the nature of supernovae was understood, and it was Nicholas Mayall who indicated that the star of 1054 was undoubtedly the supernova whose explosion produced the Crab Nebula. The search for historical supernovae started at that moment: seven other historical sightings have been found by comparing modern observations of supernova remnants with astronomical documents of past centuries. Given its great distance, the daytime "guest star" observed by the Chinese could only have been a supernova—a massive, exploding star, having exhausted its supply of energy from nuclear fusion and collapsed in on itself.

Recent analysis of historical records have found that the supernova that created the Crab Nebula probably appeared in April or early May, rising to its maximum brightness of between apparent magnitude −7 and −4.5 (brighter than everything in the night sky except the Moon) by July. The supernova was visible to the naked eye for about two years after its first observation.^[23] Thanks to the recorded observations of Far Eastern and Middle Eastern astronomers of 1054, Crab Nebula became the first astronomical object recognized as being connected to a supernova explosion.^[17]

Crab Pulsar

Image combining optical data from Hubble (in red) and X-ray images from Chandra X-ray Observatory (in blue).

In the 1960s, because of the prediction and discovery of pulsars, the Crab Nebula again became a major center of interest. It was then that Franco Pacini predicted the existence of the Crab Pulsar for the first time, which would explain the brightness of the cloud. The star was observed shortly afterwards in 1968.^[24] The discovery of the Crab pulsar, and the knowledge of its exact age (almost to the day) allows for the verification of basic physical properties of these objects, such as characteristic age and spin-down luminosity, the orders of magnitude involved (notably the strength of the magnetic field), along with various aspects related to the dynamics of the remnant. The role of this supernova to the scientific understanding of supernova remnants was crucial, as no other historical supernova created a pulsar whose precise age is known for certain. The only possible exception to this rule would be SN 1181 whose supposed remnant, 3C 58, is home to a pulsar, but its identification using Chinese observations from 1181 is sometimes contested.^[25]

Physical conditions

Hubble image of a small region of the Crab Nebula, showing Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities in its intricate filamentary structure.

In visible light, the Crab Nebula consists of a broadly oval-shaped mass of filaments, about 6 arcminutes long and 4 arcminutes wide (by comparison, the full moon is 30 arcminutes across) surrounding a diffuse blue central region. In three dimensions, the nebula is thought to be shaped either like an oblate spheroid (estimated as 1,380 pc/4,500 ly away) or a prolate spheroid (estimated as 2,020 pc/6,600 ly away).^[3] The filaments are the remnants of the progenitor star's atmosphere, and consist largely of ionised helium and hydrogen, along with carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, iron, neon and sulfur. The filaments' temperatures are typically between 11,000 and 18,000 K, and their densities are about 1,300 particles per cm³.^[26]

In 1953 Iosif Shklovsky proposed that the diffuse blue region is predominantly produced by synchrotron radiation, which is radiation given off by the curving motion of electrons in a magnetic field. The radiation corresponded to electrons moving at speeds up to half the speed of light.^[27] Three years later the theory was confirmed by observations. In the 1960s it was found that the source of the curved paths of the electrons was the strong magnetic field produced by a neutron star at the centre of the nebula.^[28]

Distance

Even though the Crab Nebula is the focus of much attention among astronomers, its distance remains an open question, owing to uncertainties in every method used to estimate its distance. In 2008, the consensus was that its distance from Earth is 2.0 ± 0.5 kpc (6,500 ± 1,600 ly). Along its longest visible dimension, it thus measures about 4.1 ± 1 pc (13 ± 3 ly) across.^[d]

The Crab Nebula currently is expanding outward at about 1,500 km/s (930 mi/s).^[29] Images taken several years apart reveal the slow expansion of the nebula,^[30] and by comparing this angular expansion with its spectroscopically determined expansion velocity, the nebula's distance can be estimated. In 1973, an analysis of many methods used to compute the distance to the nebula had reached a conclusion of about 1.9 kpc (6,300 ly), consistent with the currently cited value.^[3]

The Crab Pulsar itself was discovered in 1968. Tracing back its expansion (assuming a constant decrease of expansion speed due to the nebula's mass) yielded a date for the creation of the nebula several decades after 1054, implying that its outward velocity has decelerated less than assumed since the supernova explosion.^[31] This reduced deceleration is believed to be caused by energy from the pulsar that feeds into the nebula's magnetic field, which expands and forces the nebula's filaments outward.^[32][33]

Mass

Estimates of the total mass of the nebula are important for estimating the mass of the supernova's progenitor star. The amount of matter contained in the Crab Nebula's filaments (ejecta mass of ionized and neutral gas; mostly helium^[34]) is estimated to be 7030914732999999999♠4.6±1.8 M_☉.^[35]

Helium-rich torus

One of the many nebular components (or anomalies) of the Crab Nebula is a helium-rich torus which is visible as an east-west band crossing the pulsar region. The torus composes about 25% of the visible ejecta. However, it is suggested by calculation that about 95% of the torus is helium. As yet, there has been no plausible explanation put forth for the structure of the torus.^[36]

Central star

Main article: Crab Pulsar

Slow-motion movie of the Crab Pulsar, taken with OES Single-Photon-Camera.

Play media

Data from orbiting observatories show unexpected variations in the Crab Nebula's X-ray output, likely tied to the environment around its central neutron star.

Play media

NASA's Fermi spots 'superflares' in the Crab Nebula.

At the center of the Crab Nebula are two faint stars, one of which is the star responsible for the existence of the nebula. It was identified as such in 1942, when Rudolf Minkowski found that its optical spectrum was extremely unusual.^[37] The region around the star was found to be a strong source of radio waves in 1949^[38] and X-rays in 1963,^[39] and was identified as one of the brightest objects in the sky in gamma rays in 1967.^[40] Then, in 1968, the star was found to be emitting its radiation in rapid pulses, becoming one of the first pulsars to be discovered.^[14]

Pulsars are sources of powerful electromagnetic radiation, emitted in short and extremely regular pulses many times a second. They were a great mystery when discovered in 1967, and the team who identified the first one considered the possibility that it could be a signal from an advanced civilization.^[41] However, the discovery of a pulsating radio source in the centre of the Crab Nebula was strong evidence that pulsars were formed by supernova explosions.^[42] They now are understood to be rapidly rotating neutron stars, whose powerful magnetic field concentrates their radiation emissions into narrow beams.^[43]

The Crab Pulsar is believed to be about 28–30 km (17–19 mi) in diameter;^[44] it emits pulses of radiation every 33 milliseconds.^[45] Pulses are emitted at wavelengths across the electromagnetic spectrum, from radio waves to X-rays. Like all isolated pulsars, its period is slowing very gradually. Occasionally, its rotational period shows sharp changes, known as 'glitches', which are believed to be caused by a sudden realignment inside the neutron star. The energy released as the pulsar slows down is enormous, and it powers the emission of the synchrotron radiation of the Crab Nebula, which has a total luminosity about 75,000 times greater than that of the Sun.^[46]

The pulsar's extreme energy output creates an unusually dynamic region at the centre of the Crab Nebula. While most astronomical objects evolve so slowly that changes are visible only over timescales of many years, the inner parts of the Crab Nebula show changes over timescales of only a few days.^[47] The most dynamic feature in the inner part of the nebula is the point where the pulsar's equatorial wind slams into the bulk of the nebula, forming a shock front. The shape and position of this feature shifts rapidly, with the equatorial wind appearing as a series of wisp-like features that steepen, brighten, then fade as they move away from the pulsar to well out into the main body of the nebula.^[47]

Progenitor star

This sequence of Hubble images shows features in the inner Crab Nebula changing over a period of four months.

The star that exploded as a supernova is referred to as the supernova's progenitor star. Two types of stars explode as supernovae: white dwarfs and massive stars. In the so-called Type Ia supernovae, gases falling onto a 'dead' white dwarf raise its mass until it nears a critical level, the Chandrasekhar limit, resulting in a runaway nuclear fusion explosion that obliterates the star; in Type Ib/c and Type II supernovae, the progenitor star is a massive star whose core runs out of fuel to power its nuclear fusion reactions and collapses in on itself, releasing gravitational potential energy in a form that blows away the star's outer layers. The presence of a pulsar in the Crab Nebula means that it must have formed in a core-collapse supernova;^[48] Type Ia supernovae do not produce pulsars.^[49]

Theoretical models of supernova explosions suggest that the star that exploded to produce the Crab Nebula must have had a mass of between 9 and 11 M_☉.^[36][50] Stars with masses lower than 8 M_☉ are thought to be too small to produce supernova explosions, and end their lives by producing a planetary nebula instead, while a star heavier than 12 M_☉ would have produced a nebula with a different chemical composition from that observed in the Crab Nebula.^[51] Recent studies, however, suggest the progenitor could have been a super-asymptotic giant branch star in the 8 to 10 M_☉ range that would have exploded in an electron-capture supernova.^[52]

A significant problem in studies of the Crab Nebula is that the combined mass of the nebula and the pulsar add up to considerably less than the predicted mass of the progenitor star, and the question of where the 'missing mass' is, remains unresolved.^[35] Estimates of the mass of the nebula are made by measuring the total amount of light emitted, and calculating the mass required, given the measured temperature and density of the nebula. Estimates range from about 1–5 M_☉, with 2–3 M_☉ being the generally accepted value.^[51] The neutron star mass is estimated to be between 1.4 and 2 M_☉.

The predominant theory to account for the missing mass of the Crab Nebula is that a substantial proportion of the mass of the progenitor was carried away before the supernova explosion in a fast stellar wind, a phenomenon commonly seen in Wolf–Rayet stars. However, this would have created a shell around the nebula. Although attempts have been made at several wavelengths to observe a shell, none has yet been found.^[53]

Transits by Solar System bodies

Chandra image showing Saturn's moon Titan transiting the nebula.

The Crab Nebula lies roughly 1.5 degrees away from the ecliptic—the plane of Earth's orbit around the Sun. This means that the Moon—and occasionally, planets—can transit or occult the nebula. Although the Sun does not transit the nebula, its corona passes in front of it. These transits and occultations can be used to analyse both the nebula and the object passing in front of it, by observing how radiation from the nebula is altered by the transiting body.

Lunar

Lunar transits have been used to map X-ray emissions from the nebula. Before the launch of X-ray-observing satellites, such as the Chandra X-ray Observatory, X-ray observations generally had quite low angular resolution, but when the Moon passes in front of the nebula, its position is very accurately known, and so the variations in the nebula's brightness can be used to create maps of X-ray emission.^[54] When X-rays were first observed from the Crab Nebula, a lunar occultation was used to determine the exact location of their source.^[39]

Solar

The Sun's corona passes in front of the Crab Nebula every June. Variations in the radio waves received from the Crab Nebula at this time can be used to infer details about the corona's density and structure. Early observations established that the corona extended out to much greater distances than had previously been thought; later observations found that the corona contained substantial density variations.^[55]

Other objects

Very rarely, Saturn transits the Crab Nebula. Its transit on 4 January 2003 (UTC) was the first since 31 December 1295 (O.S.); another will not occur until 5 August 2267. Researchers used the Chandra X-ray Observatory to observe Saturn's moon Titan as it crossed the nebula, and found that Titan's X-ray 'shadow' was larger than its solid surface, due to absorption of X-rays in its atmosphere. These observations showed that the thickness of Titan's atmosphere is 880 km (550 mi).^[56] The transit of Saturn itself could not be observed, because Chandra was passing through the Van Allen belts at the time.

Gallery

The Crab Nebula seen in radio, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma-rays (8 March 2015)

The Crab Nebula – five observatories (10 May 2017)

The Crab Nebula – five observatories (animation; 10 May 2017)

See also

• Crab Nebula in fiction


• Lists of nebulae

Notes

.mw-parser-output .refbegin{font-size:90%;margin-bottom:0.5em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul{list-style-type:none;margin-left:0}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul>li,.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>dl>dd{margin-left:0;padding-left:3.2em;text-indent:-3.2em;list-style:none}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-100{font-size:100%}

1. 
   ^{^} Size as measured on a very deep plate taken by Sidney van den Bergh in late 1969.^[3][57]
   


2. 
   ^{^} Apparent Magnitude of 8.4 – distance modulus of 7001115000000000000♠11.5±0.5 = 7000310000000000000♠−3.1±0.5
   


3. 
   ^{^} distance × tan( diameter_angle = 420″ ) = 7000409999999999999♠4.1±1.0 pc diameter = 7001130000000000000♠13±3 light year diameter

References

1. 
   ^ ^abc "M 1". SIMBAD. Centre de données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 12 February 2012..mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/12px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}
   


2. 
   ^ Kaplan, David L.; Chatterjee, S.; Gaensler, B. M.; Anderson, J. (2008). "A Precise Proper Motion for the Crab Pulsar, and the Difficulty of Testing Spin-Kick Alignment for Young Neutron Stars". The Astrophysical Journal. 677 (2): 1201–1215. arXiv:0801.1142. Bibcode:2008ApJ...677.1201K. doi:10.1086/529026.
   


3. 
   ^ ^abcd Trimble, Virginia Louise (1973). "The Distance to the Crab Nebula and NP 0532". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 85 (507): 579–585. Bibcode:1973PASP...85..579T. doi:10.1086/129507. JSTOR 40675440.
   


4. 
   ^ ^ab Hester, J. J. (2008). "The Crab Nebula: An Astrophysical Chimera". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 46: 127–155. Bibcode:2008ARA&A..46..127H. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110608.
   


5. 
   ^ Parsons, William (1844). "Observations on Some of the Nebulae". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 134. fig. 81, plate xviii, p. 321. doi:10.1098/rstl.1844.0012. JSTOR 108366.
   


6. 
   ^ "Crab Nebula: The Spirit of Halloween Lives on as a Dead Star Creates Celestial Havoc". Chandra X-ray Observatory. Harvard University. 24 October 2006. Retrieved 11 February 2012. The neutron star, which has the mass equivalent to the sun crammed into a rapidly spinning ball of neutrons twelve miles across, is the bright white dot in the center of the image.
   


7. 
   ^ "Pulsar Wind Nebulae". Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. 4 November 2016. Retrieved 26 March 2017.
   


8. 
   ^ ^ab Lampland, C. O. (1921). "Observed Changes in the Structure of the "Crab" Nebula (N. G. C. 1952)". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 33 (192): 79–84. Bibcode:1921PASP...33...79L. doi:10.1086/123039. JSTOR 40710638.
   


9. 
   ^ Katgert-Merkelijn, J.; Damen, J. (2000). "A short biography of Jan Hendrik Oort: 7. Crab Nebula". Leiden University Library. Archived from the original on 4 September 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2015.
   


10. 
    ^ Usui, Tadashi (11 January 2007). "Why and how did a Japanese poet record the Supernova of AD 1054?". Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
    


11. 
    ^ Fujiwara no Sadaie (c. 1200). Meigetsuki [Record of the Clear Moon].
    


12. 
    ^ Gingerich, Owen (April 1986). "Islamic astronomy" (PDF). Scientific American. 254 (10): 74. Bibcode:1986SciAm.254d..74G. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0486-74.
    


13. 
    ^ Ibn Abi Usaibia (1971) [1245–1246]. "Chapter 10: On the Classes of Physicians of Iraq, al-Jazirah and Diyar Bekr". Lives of the Physicians. Kopf, Lothar (trans.).
    


14. 
    ^ ^ab Green, David A.; Stephenson, F. Richard (2003). Weiler, K. W., ed. The Historical Supernovae. Supernovae and Gamma Ray Bursters. Lecture Notes in Physics. 598. Berlin: Springer. pp. 7–19. arXiv:astro-ph/0301603. Bibcode:2003LNP...598....7G. doi:10.1007/3-540-45863-8_2. ISBN 978-3-540-44053-6.
    


15. 
    ^ ^abc Barrow, John D. (2008). Cosmic Imagery: Key Images in the History of Science. Random House. p. 45. ISBN 978-0-224-07523-7.
    


16. 
    ^ ^ab Pugh, Philip (November 2011). Observing the Messier Objects with a Small Telescope: In the Footsteps of a Great Observer. Springer Science. pp. 8–10. ISBN 978-0-387-85357-4.
    


17. 
    ^ ^abc Mayall, Nicholas Ulrich (1939). "The Crab Nebula, a Probable Supernova". Astronomical Society of the Pacific Leaflets. 3 (119): 145. Bibcode:1939ASPL....3..145M.
    


18. 
    ^ Jones, Kenneth Glyn (1975). The Search for the Nebulae. Alpha Academic.
    


19. 
    ^ Rossi, Bruno Benedetto (1970). "The Crab Nebula. Ancient History and Recent Discoveries". In Conversi, M. Evolution of Particle Physics. Academic Press. p. 237.
    


20. 
    ^ ^ab Lundmark, Knut (1921). "Suspected New Stars Recorded in Old Chronicles and Among Recent Meridian Observations". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 33 (195): 225–238. Bibcode:1921PASP...33..225L. doi:10.1086/123101. JSTOR 40668518.
    


21. 
    ^ Duncan, John Charles (1921). "Changes Observed in the Crab Nebula in Taurus". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 7 (6): 179–181. Bibcode:1921PNAS....7..179D. doi:10.1073/pnas.7.6.179. PMC 1084821. PMID 16586833.
    


22. 
    ^ Srinivasan, G. (1997). "Neutron Stars". Stellar Remnants. Lecture Notes 1995, Swiss Society for Astrophysics and Astronomy. Springer Science. p. 108. ISBN 978-3-540-61520-0.
    


23. 
    ^ Collins, George W., II; Claspy, William P.; Martin, John C. (1999). "A Reinterpretation of Historical References to the Supernova of A.D. 1054". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 111 (761): 871–880. arXiv:astro-ph/9904285. Bibcode:1999PASP..111..871C. doi:10.1086/316401.
    


24. 
    ^ Setti, Giancarlo (2012). "Franco Pacini (1939–2012)". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 44: 011. doi:10.3847/BAASOBIT2012011 (inactive 2019-03-11).
    


25. 
    ^ Bietenholz, M. F. (July 2006). "Radio Images of 3C 58: Expansion and Motion of Its Wisp" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal. 645 (2): 1180–1187. arXiv:astro-ph/0603197. Bibcode:2006ApJ...645.1180B. doi:10.1086/504584.
    


26. 
    ^ Fesen, R. A.; Kirshner, R. P. (1982). "The Crab Nebula. I – Spectrophotometry of the filaments". The Astrophysical Journal. 258 (1): 1–10. Bibcode:1982ApJ...258....1F. doi:10.1086/160043.
    


27. 
    ^ Shklovskii, Iosif (1953). "On the Nature of the Crab Nebula's Optical Emission". Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 90: 983. Bibcode:1957SvA.....1..690S.
    


28. 
    ^ Burn, B. J. (1973). "A synchrotron model for the continuum spectrum of the Crab Nebula". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 165 (4): 421–429. Bibcode:1973MNRAS.165..421B. doi:10.1093/mnras/165.4.421.
    


29. 
    ^ Bietenholz, M. F.; Kronberg, P. P.; Hogg, D. E.; Wilson, A. S. (1991). "The expansion of the Crab Nebula". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 373: L59–L62. Bibcode:1991ApJ...373L..59B. doi:10.1086/186051.
    


30. 
    ^ Nemiroff, R.; Bonnell, J., eds. (27 December 2001). "Animation showing expansion from 1973 to 2001". Astronomy Picture of the Day. NASA. Retrieved 10 March 2010.
    


31. 
    ^ Trimble, Virginia Louise (1968). "Motions and Structure of the Filamentary Envelope of the Crab Nebula" (PDF). Astronomical Journal. 73: 535. Bibcode:1968AJ.....73..535T. doi:10.1086/110658.
    


32. 
    ^ Bejger, M.; Haensel, P. (2003). "Accelerated expansion of the Crab Nebula and evaluation of its neutron-star parameters". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 405 (2): 747–751. arXiv:astro-ph/0301071. Bibcode:2003A&A...405..747B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030642.
    


33. 
    ^ "Crab Nebula exploded in 1054". Astronomy.com. 8 June 2007. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
    


34. 
    ^ Green, D. A.; Tuffs, R. J.; Popescu, C. C. (2004). "Far-infrared and submillimetre observations of the Crab nebula". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 355 (4): 1315–1326. arXiv:astro-ph/0409469. Bibcode:2004MNRAS.355.1315G. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08414.x.
    


35. 
    ^ ^ab Fesen, Robert A.; Shull, J. Michael; Hurford, Alan P. (1997). "An Optical Study of the Circumstellar Environment Around the Crab Nebula". The Astronomical Journal. 113: 354–363. Bibcode:1997AJ....113..354F. doi:10.1086/118258.
    


36. 
    ^ ^ab MacAlpine, Gordon M.; Ecklund, Tait C.; Lester, William R.; Vanderveer, Steven J.; Strolger, Louis-Gregory (2007). "A Spectroscopic Study of Nuclear Processing and the Production of Anomalously Strong Lines in the Crab Nebula". The Astronomical Journal. 133 (1): 81–88. arXiv:astro-ph/0609803. Bibcode:2007AJ....133...81M. doi:10.1086/509504.
    


37. 
    ^ Minkowski, Rudolph (September 1942). "The Crab Nebula". The Astrophysical Journal. 96: 199. Bibcode:1942ApJ....96..199M. doi:10.1086/144447.
    


38. 
    ^ Bolton, John G.; Stanley, G. J.; Slee, O. B. (1949). "Positions of three discrete sources of Galactic radio frequency radiation". Nature. 164 (4159): 101–102. Bibcode:1949Natur.164..101B. doi:10.1038/164101b0.
    


39. 
    ^ ^ab Bowyer, S.; Byram, E. T.; Chubb, T. A.; Friedman, H. (1964). "Lunar Occultation of X-ray Emission from the Crab Nebula". Science. 146 (3646): 912–917. Bibcode:1964Sci...146..912B. doi:10.1126/science.146.3646.912. PMID 17777056.
    


40. 
    ^ Haymes, R. C.; Ellis, D. V.; Fishman, G. J.; Kurfess, J. D.; Tucker, W. H. (1968). "Observation of Gamma Radiation from the Crab Nebula". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 151: L9. Bibcode:1968ApJ...151L...9H. doi:10.1086/180129.
    


41. 
    ^ Del Puerto, C. (2005). "Pulsars In The Headlines". EAS Publications. 16: 115–119. Bibcode:2005EAS....16..115D. doi:10.1051/eas:2005070.
    


42. 
    ^ LaViolette, Paul A. (April 2006). Decoding the Message of the Pulsars: Intelligent Communication from the Galaxy. Bear & Co. p. 73. ISBN 978-1-59143-062-9.
    


43. 
    ^ LaViolette, Paul A. (April 2006). Decoding the Message of the Pulsars: Intelligent Communication from the Galaxy. Bear & Co. p. 135. ISBN 978-1-59143-062-9.
    


44. 
    ^ Bejger, M.; Haensel, P. (2002). "Moments of inertia for neutron and strange stars: Limits derived for the Crab pulsar". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 396 (3): 917–921. arXiv:astro-ph/0209151. Bibcode:2002A&A...396..917B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021241.
    


45. 
    ^ Harnden, F. R.; Seward, F. D. (1984). "Einstein observations of the Crab nebula pulsar". The Astrophysical Journal. 283: 279–285. Bibcode:1984ApJ...283..279H. doi:10.1086/162304.
    


46. 
    ^ Kaufmann, W. J. (1996). Universe (4th ed.). W. H. Freeman. p. 428. ISBN 978-0-7167-2379-0.
    


47. 
    ^ ^ab Hester, J. Jeff; Scowen, P. A.; Sankrit, R.; Michel, F. C.; et al. (1996). "The Extremely Dynamic Structure of the Inner Crab Nebula". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 28 (2): 950. Bibcode:1996BAAS...28..950H.
    


48. 
    ^ Maoz, Dan (December 2011). Astrophysics in a Nutshell. Princeton University Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-1-4008-3934-6.
    


49. 
    ^ Pasachoff, Jay M.; Filippenko, Alex (August 2013). The Cosmos: Astronomy in the New Millennium. Cambridge University Press. p. 357. ISBN 978-1-107-27695-6.
    


50. 
    ^ Nomoto, K. (January 1985). "Evolutionary models of the Crab Nebula's progenitor". The Crab Nebula and Related Supernova Remnants: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, October 11-12, 1984. Cambridge University Press. pp. 97–113. Bibcode:1985cnrs.work...97N. ISBN 0-521-30530-6.
    


51. 
    ^ ^ab Davidson, K.; Fesen, R. A. (1985). "Recent developments concerning the Crab Nebula". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 23 (507): 119–146. Bibcode:1985ARA&A..23..119D. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001003.
    


52. 
    ^ Tominaga, N.; Blinnikov, S. I.; Nomoto, Ken'Ichi (2013). "Supernova explosions of super-asymptotic giant branch stars: multicolor light curves of electron-capture supernovae". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 771 (1): L12. arXiv:1305.6813. Bibcode:2013ApJ...771L..12T. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/771/1/L12.
    


53. 
    ^ Frail, D. A.; Kassim, N. E.; Cornwell, T. J.; Goss, W. M. (1995). "Does the Crab Have a Shell?". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 454 (2): L129–L132. arXiv:astro-ph/9509135. Bibcode:1995ApJ...454L.129F. doi:10.1086/309794.
    


54. 
    ^ Palmieri, T. M.; Seward, F. D.; Toor, A.; van Flandern, T. C. (1975). "Spatial distribution of X-rays in the Crab Nebula". The Astrophysical Journal. 202: 494–497. Bibcode:1975ApJ...202..494P. doi:10.1086/153998.
    


55. 
    ^ Erickson, W. C. (1964). "The Radio-Wave Scattering Properties of the Solar Corona". The Astrophysical Journal. 139: 1290. Bibcode:1964ApJ...139.1290E. doi:10.1086/147865.
    


56. 
    ^ Mori, K.; Tsunemi, H.; Katayama, H.; Burrows, D. N.; Garmire, G. P.; Metzger, A. E. (2004). "An X-Ray Measurement of Titan's Atmospheric Extent from Its Transit of the Crab Nebula". The Astrophysical Journal. 607 (2): 1065–1069. arXiv:astro-ph/0403283. Bibcode:2004ApJ...607.1065M. doi:10.1086/383521. Chandra images used by Mori et al. can be viewed here.
    


57. 
    ^ van den Bergh, Sidney (1970). "A Jetlike Structure Associated with the Crab Nebula". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 160: L27. Bibcode:1970ApJ...160L..27V. doi:10.1086/180516.
    

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Crab Nebula.

• 
  


• Crab Nebula on WikiSky: DSS2, SDSS, GALEX, IRAS, Hydrogen α, X-Ray, Astrophoto, Sky Map, Articles and images
  


• 
  Crab Nebula in the University of Cambridge Catalogue of Galactic Supernova Remnants


• 
  Crab Nebula in the SEDS Messier index


• 
  Crab Nebula in the Chandra X-ray Observatory Field Guide series


• 
  Crab Nebula images by the Hubble Space Telescope
  


• 
  Animation of expansion from 2008-2017 by Detlef Hartmann

v t e Messier objects
List	M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13 M14 M15 M16 M17 M18 M19 M20 M21 M22 M23 M24 M25 M26 M27 M28 M29 M30 M31 M32 M33 M34 M35 M36 M37 M38 M39 M40 M41 M42 M43 M44 M45 M46 M47 M48 M49 M50 M51 M52 M53 M54 M55 M56 M57 M58 M59 M60 M61 M62 M63 M64 M65 M66 M67 M68 M69 M70 M71 M72 M73 M74 M75 M76 M77 M78 M79 M80 M81 M82 M83 M84 M85 M86 M87 M88 M89 M90 M91 M92 M93 M94 M95 M96 M97 M98 M99 M100 M101 M102 M103 M104 M105 M106 M107 M108 M109 M110
See also	Caldwell catalogue Catalogue of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars Herschel 400 Catalogue Index Catalogue New General Catalogue Revised New General Catalogue
Book Category Commons Portal

v t e Sharpless catalog
Sh2-1 Sh2-2 Sh2-3 Sh2-4 Sh2-5 Sh2-6 Sh2-7 Sh2-8 Sh2-9 Sh2-10 Sh2-11 Sh2-12 Sh2-13 Sh2-14 Sh2-15 Sh2-16 Sh2-17 Sh2-18 Sh2-19 Sh2-20 Sh2-21 Sh2-22 Sh2-23 Sh2-24 Sh2-25 Sh2-26 Sh2-27 Sh2-28 Sh2-29 Sh2-30 Sh2-31 Sh2-32 Sh2-33 Sh2-34 Sh2-35 Sh2-36 Sh2-37 Sh2-38 Sh2-39 Sh2-40 Sh2-41 Sh2-42 Sh2-43 Sh2-44 Sh2-45 Sh2-46 Sh2-47 Sh2-48 Sh2-49 Sh2-50 Sh2-51 Sh2-52 Sh2-53 Sh2-54 Sh2-55 Sh2-56 Sh2-57 Sh2-58 Sh2-59 Sh2-60 Sh2-61 Sh2-62 Sh2-63 Sh2-64 Sh2-65 Sh2-66 Sh2-67 Sh2-68 Sh2-69 Sh2-70 Sh2-71 Sh2-72 Sh2-73 Sh2-74 Sh2-75 Sh2-76 Sh2-77 Sh2-78 Sh2-79 Sh2-80 Sh2-81 Sh2-82 Sh2-83 Sh2-84 Sh2-85 Sh2-86 Sh2-87 Sh2-88 Sh2-89 Sh2-90 Sh2-91 Sh2-92 Sh2-93 Sh2-94 Sh2-95 Sh2-96 Sh2-97 Sh2-98 Sh2-99 Sh2-100 Sh2-101 Sh2-102 Sh2-103 Sh2-104 Sh2-105 Sh2-106 Sh2-107 Sh2-108 Sh2-109 Sh2-110 Sh2-111 Sh2-112 Sh2-113 Sh2-114 Sh2-115 Sh2-116 Sh2-117 Sh2-118 Sh2-119 Sh2-120 Sh2-121 Sh2-122 Sh2-123 Sh2-124 Sh2-125 Sh2-126 Sh2-127 Sh2-128 Sh2-129 Sh2-130 Sh2-131 Sh2-132 Sh2-133 Sh2-134 Sh2-135 Sh2-136 Sh2-137 Sh2-138 Sh2-139 Sh2-140 Sh2-141 Sh2-142 Sh2-143 Sh2-144 Sh2-145 Sh2-146 Sh2-147 Sh2-148 Sh2-149 Sh2-150 Sh2-151 Sh2-152 Sh2-153 Sh2-154 Sh2-155 Sh2-156 Sh2-157 Sh2-158 Sh2-159 Sh2-160 Sh2-161 Sh2-162 Sh2-163 Sh2-164 Sh2-165 Sh2-166 Sh2-167 Sh2-168 Sh2-169 Sh2-170 Sh2-171 Sh2-172 Sh2-173 Sh2-174 Sh2-175 Sh2-176 Sh2-177 Sh2-178 Sh2-179 Sh2-180 Sh2-181 Sh2-182 Sh2-183 Sh2-184 Sh2-185 Sh2-186 Sh2-187 Sh2-188 Sh2-189 Sh2-190 Sh2-191 Sh2-192 Sh2-193 Sh2-194 Sh2-195 Sh2-196 Sh2-197 Sh2-198 Sh2-199 Sh2-201 Sh2-202 Sh2-203 Sh2-204 Sh2-205 Sh2-206 Sh2-207 Sh2-208 Sh2-209 Sh2-210 Sh2-211 Sh2-212 Sh2-213 Sh2-214 Sh2-215 Sh2-216 Sh2-217 Sh2-218 Sh2-219 Sh2-220 Sh2-221 Sh2-222 Sh2-223 Sh2-224 Sh2-225 Sh2-226 Sh2-227 Sh2-228 Sh2-229 Sh2-230 Sh2-231 Sh2-232 Sh2-233 Sh2-234 Sh2-235 Sh2-236 Sh2-237 Sh2-238 Sh2-239 Sh2-240 Sh2-241 Sh2-242 Sh2-243 Sh2-244 Sh2-245 Sh2-246 Sh2-247 Sh2-248 Sh2-249 Sh2-250 Sh2-251 Sh2-252 Sh2-253 Sh2-254 Sh2-255 Sh2-256 Sh2-257 Sh2-258 Sh2-259 Sh2-260 Sh2-261 Sh2-262 Sh2-263 Sh2-264 Sh2-265 Sh2-266 Sh2-267 Sh2-268 Sh2-269 Sh2-270 Sh2-271 Sh2-272 Sh2-273 Sh2-274 Sh2-275 Sh2-276 Sh2-277 Sh2-278 Sh2-279 Sh2-280 Sh2-281 Sh2-282 Sh2-283 Sh2-284 Sh2-285 Sh2-286 Sh2-287 Sh2-288 Sh2-289 Sh2-290 Sh2-291 Sh2-292 Sh2-293 Sh2-294 Sh2-295 Sh2-296 Sh2-297 Sh2-298 Sh2-299 Sh2-301 Sh2-302 Sh2-303 Sh2-304 Sh2-305 Sh2-306 Sh2-307 Sh2-308 Sh2-309 Sh2-310 Sh2-311 Sh2-312 Sh2-313
See also: Gum catalog Nebula RCW Catalogue Stewart Sharpless

v t e New General Catalogue 1500 to 1999
1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Astronomical catalog List of NGC objects

Coordinates: 5^h 34^m 31.97^s, +22° 00′ 52.1″

• Astronomy portal


• Cosmology portal


• Star portal

Authority control	GND: 4148360-1 LCCN: sh85033695 VIAF: 315126060 WorldCat Identities (via VIAF): 315126060

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here