2001–02 Serie A

























































Serie A
Season 2001–02
Champions
Juventus
26th title
Relegated
Verona
Lecce
Fiorentina
Venezia
Champions League
Juventus
Roma
Internazionale
Milan
UEFA Cup
Chievo
Lazio
Parma
Matches played 306
Goals scored 806 (2.63 per match)
Top goalscorer
Dario Hübner
David Trezeguet
(24 goals each)
Biggest home win
Lazio 5–0 Brescia
(4 November 2001)
Lazio 5–0 Perugia
(20 January 2002)
Piacenza 5–0 Venezia
(17 February 2002)
Juventus 5–0 Brescia
(28 April 2002)
Roma 5–0 Chievo
(28 April 2002)
Biggest away win
Atalanta 1–5 Udinese
(21 October 2001)
Lazio 1–5 Roma
(10 March 2002)
Highest scoring
Lazio 5–4 Hellas Verona
(21 April 2002)
Average attendance 25,992

← 2000–01


2002–03 →




2001–02 Serie A team distribution

In the 2001–02 season, the Serie A, the major football Italian professional league, was composed by 18 teams, for the 14th consecutive time from season 1988–89.


The first two teams qualified directly to the UEFA Champions League, teams ending in the third and fourth places had to play Champions League qualifications, teams ending in the fifth and sixth places qualified for the UEFA Cup (another spot was given to the winner of Coppa Italia), while the last four teams were to be relegated to Serie B. However, Fiorentina's subsequent bankruptcy led to them being placed in the fourth tier of Italian football.


Juventus won its 26th title on the final day of the season after original leaders Internazionale (who finished third) lost 4–2 away to Lazio, and with it their chance at winning their first Scudetto since 1989. Second place went to Roma.


This season also featured Chievo's "miracle". The club, newly promoted to Serie A for the first time, were top of the table for six weeks early in the season. However, after the Christmas break, they hit some bad form and finished the season in fifth place.




Contents






  • 1 Personnel and sponsoring


  • 2 League table


  • 3 Results


  • 4 Overall


  • 5 Top scorers


  • 6 Number of teams by region


  • 7 References and sources


  • 8 Footnotes


  • 9 External links





Personnel and sponsoring





















































































































Team
 Head Coach
 Kit manufacturer
 Shirt sponsor

Atalanta
Italy Giovanni Vavassori
Asics
 ORTOBELL

Bologna
Italy Francesco Guidolin
Macron
Area Banca

Brescia
Italy Carlo Mazzone
 Garman
Banca Lombarda

Chievo
Italy Luigi Delneri
Joma
 Paluani

Fiorentina
Italy Roberto Mancini
Italy Ottavio Bianchi
Italy Luciano Chiarugi
Mizuno
Toyota

Hellas Verona
Italy Alberto Malesani
Lotto
Amica Chips

Internazionale
Argentina Héctor Cúper
Nike
Pirelli

Juventus
Italy Marcello Lippi
Lotto
Fastweb

Lazio
Italy Dino Zoff
Italy Alberto Zaccheroni
Puma
Siemens Mobile

Lecce
Italy Delio Rossi
Asics
 Banca 121 (Banca del Salento)

Milan
Turkey Fatih Terim
Italy Carlo Ancelotti
Adidas
Opel

Parma
Italy Pietro Carmignani
Champion
Parmalat

Piacenza
Italy Walter Novellino
Lotto
 Publitel

Perugia
Italy Serse Cosmi
Galex
Daewoo

Roma
Italy Fabio Capello
Kappa
INA Assitalia

Torino
Italy Giancarlo Camolese
Asics
 Conto Arancio

Udinese
Italy Giampiero Ventura
Diadora
 Ristora

Venezia
Italy Alfredo Magni
Italy Cesare Prandelli
Kelme
 Emmezeta


League table




















































































































































































































































Pos
 Team

[

  • v

  • t

  • e


]
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Pts
 Qualification or relegation
1
Juventus (C)
 34
 20
 11
 3
 64
 23
 +41
 71
2002–03 UEFA Champions League First group stage
2
Roma
 34
 19
 13
 2
 58
 24
 +34
 70
3
Internazionale
 34
 20
 9
 5
 62
 35
 +27
 69
2002–03 UEFA Champions League Third qualifying round
4
Milan
 34
 14
 13
 7
 47
 33
 +14
 55
5
Chievo
 34
 14
 12
 8
 57
 52
 +5
 54
2002–03 UEFA Cup First round
6
Lazio
 34
 14
 11
 9
 50
 37
 +13
 53
7
Bologna
 34
 15
 7
 12
 40
 40
 0
 52
2002 UEFA Intertoto Cup Third round
8
Perugia
 34
 13
 7
 14
 38
 46
 −8
 46
9
Atalanta
 34
 12
 9
 13
 41
 50
 −9
 45
10
Parma
 34
 12
 8
 14
 43
 47
 −4
 44[a]
2002–03 UEFA Cup First round
11
Torino
 34
 10
 13
 11
 37
 39
 −2
 43[b]
2002 UEFA Intertoto Cup Second round
12
Piacenza
 34
 11
 9
 14
 49
 43
 +6
 42
13
Brescia
 34
 9
 13
 12
 43
 52
 −9
 40[c]
14
Udinese
 34
 11
 7
 16
 41
 52
 −11
 40[c]
15
Hellas Verona (R)
 34
 11
 6
 17
 41
 53
 −12
 39
 Relegation to Serie B
16
Lecce (R)
 34
 6
 10
 18
 36
 56
 −20
 28
17
Fiorentina (B)
 34
 5
 7
 22
 29
 63
 −34
 22[d]
 Relegation to Serie C2
18
Venezia (R)
 34
 3
 9
 22
 30
 61
 −31
 18
 Relegation to Serie B

Source: Almanacco Illustrato del Calcio - La Storia 1898-2004, Panini Edizioni, Modena, September 2005
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd head-to-head points; 3rd head-to-head goal difference; 4th head-to-head goals scored; 5th goal difference; 6th number of goals scored
(B) ?; (C) Champion; (R) Relegated.
Notes:




  1. ^ Parma gained entry to the 2002–03 UEFA Cup as the 2001–02 Coppa Italia champions.


  2. ^ Torino gained entry to the 2002 UEFA Intertoto Cup after Atalanta declined to take part.


  3. ^ ab BRE 2–0 UDI; UDI 3–2 BRE


  4. ^ Fiorentina was denied entry to the 2002–03 Serie B season, having entered administration. It was later admitted to the Lega Professionisti Serie C after bankruptcy.




Results


















































































































































































































































































































































































































Home Away
ATA
BOL
BRE
CHV
FIO
INT
JUV
LAZ
LCE
MIL
PAR
PER
PIA
ROM
TOR
UDI
VEN
HEL

Atalanta
2–2
 0–0
 1–2
 2–0
 2–4
 0–2
 0–1
 2–1
 1–1
 4–1
 2–1
 1–1
 1–1
 1–1
 1–5
 1–0
 1–0

Bologna
 1–0
2–1
 3–1
 3–2
 2–1
 0–0
 2–0
 4–3
 2–0
 1–0
 2–1
 1–2
 1–3
 1–0
 0–1
 1–1
 2–1

Brescia
 3–3
 3–0
2–2
 3–0
 1–3
 0–4
 1–1
 1–1
 2–2
 1–4
 3–0
 2–2
 0–0
 1–2
 2–0
 3–2
 0–0

Chievo
 2–1
 2–0
 1–1
2–2
 2–2
 1–3
 3–1
 2–1
 1–1
 1–0
 2–0
 4–2
 0–3
 3–0
 1–2
 1–1
 2–1

Fiorentina
 3–1
 1–1
 1–0
 0–2
0–1
 1–1
 0–1
 1–2
 1–1
 1–2
 1–3
 1–3
 2–2
 0–0
 0–0
 3–1
 0–2

Internazionale
 1–2
 1–0
 2–1
 1–2
 2–0
2–2
 0–0
 2–0
 2–4
 2–0
 4–1
 3–1
 3–1
 0–0
 3–2
 2–1
 3–0

Juventus
 3–0
 2–1
 5–0
 3–2
 2–1
 0–0
1–1
 3–0
 1–0
 3–1
 2–0
 2–0
 0–2
 3–3
 3–0
 4–0
 1–0

Lazio
 2–0
 2–2
 5–0
 1–1
 3–0
 4–2
 1–0
1–0
 1–1
 0–0
 5–0
 1–1
 1–5
 0–0
 2–0
 4–2
 5–4

Lecce
 0–2
 1–0
 1–3
 2–3
 4–1
 1–2
 0–0
 1–2
0–1
 1–1
 2–3
 0–0
 1–1
 1–1
 1–2
 2–1
 1–1

Milan
 0–0
 0–0
 0–0
 3–2
 5–2
 0–1
 1–1
 2–0
 3–0
3–1
 1–1
 0–0
 0–0
 2–1
 2–3
 1–1
 2–1

Parma
 1–1
 2–1
 1–0
 0–0
 2–0
 2–2
 1–0
 1–0
 1–1
 0–1
2–1
 2–2
 1–2
 0–1
 2–0
 2–1
 2–2

Perugia
 2–0
 1–0
 1–1
 2–2
 2–0
 0–2
 0–4
 0–0
 2–1
 3–1
 2–1
1–0
 0–0
 2–0
 1–2
 2–0
 3–1

Piacenza
 1–2
 2–0
 0–1
 2–2
 3–0
 2–3
 0–1
 1–0
 1–2
 0–1
 2–3
 2–0
2–0
 3–1
 1–2
 5–0
 3–0

Roma
 3–1
 3–1
 0–0
 5–0
 2–1
 0–0
 0–0
 2–0
 5–1
 1–0
 3–1
 1–0
 2–0
1–0
 1–1
 1–0
 3–2

Torino
 1–2
 1–1
 1–3
 2–2
 1–0
 0–1
 2–2
 1–0
 1–1
 1–0
 1–0
 1–0
 1–1
 0–1
3–1
 1–2
 5–1

Udinese
 1–2
 0–1
 3–2
 1–2
 1–2
 1–1
 0–2
 1–4
 0–1
 1–2
 3–2
 0–0
 1–1
 1–1
 2–2
1–0
 2–1

Venezia
 0–1
 0–1
 1–2
 0–0
 2–0
 1–1
 1–2
 0–0
 1–1
 1–4
 3–4
 0–2
 2–3
 2–2
 1–1
 2–1
0–1

Hellas Verona
 3–1
 0–1
 2–0
 3–2
 1–2
 0–3
 2–2
 3–1
 2–1
 1–2
 1–0
 1–1
 1–0
 1–1
 0–1
 1–0
 1–0

Updated to match(es) played on unknown. Source: lega-calcio.it (in Italian)
Colours: Blue = home team win; Yellow = draw; Red = away team win.


Overall



  • Most wins - Juventus and Internazionale (20)

  • Fewest wins - Venezia (3)

  • Most draws - Roma, Milan, Torino and Brescia (13)

  • Fewest draws - Hellas Verona (6)

  • Most losses - Fiorentina and Venezia (22)

  • Fewest losses - Roma (2)

  • Most goals scored - Juventus (64)

  • Fewest goals scored - Fiorentina (29)

  • Most goals conceded - Fiorentina (63)

  • Fewest goals conceded - Juventus (23)



Top scorers

















































































Rank
 Player
 Club
 Goals
1
France David Trezeguet
Juventus
 24

Italy Dario Hübner
Piacenza
 24
3
Italy Christian Vieri
Internazionale
 22
4
Italy Marco Di Vaio
Parma
 20
5
Italy Filippo Maniero
Venezia
 18
6
Italy Alessandro Del Piero
Juventus
 16

Italy Cristiano Doni
Atalanta
 16
8
Italy Roberto Muzzi
Udinese
 14

Ukraine Andriy Shevchenko
Milan
 14
10
Argentina Hernán Crespo
Lazio
 13

Italy Massimo Marazzina
Chievo
 13

Italy Vincenzo Montella
Roma
 13

Italy Luca Toni
Brescia
 13


Number of teams by region
Region
 Number of teams
 Teams
1
 Lombardy
 4
Atalanta, Brescia, Internazionale and Milan
2
 Emilia-Romagna
 3
Bologna, Parma and Piacenza

 Veneto
 3
Chievo, Hellas Verona and Venezia
4
 Lazio
 2
Lazio and Roma

 Piedmont
 2
Juventus and Torino
6
 Apulia
 1
Lecce

 Friuli-Venezia Giulia
 1
Udinese

 Tuscany
 1
Fiorentna

 Umbria
 1
Perugia


References and sources



  • Almanacco Illustrato del Calcio - La Storia 1898-2004, Panini Edizioni, Modena, September 2005


Footnotes





External links




  • it:Classifica calcio Serie A italiana 2002 - Italian version with pictures and info.


  • [1] - All results on RSSSF Website.


  • 2001/2002 Serie A Squads - (www.footballsquads.com)













Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Information security

Image
This article is part of a series on Information security Related security categories Internet security Cyberwarfare Computer security Mobile security Network security Threats Computer crime Vulnerability Eavesdropping Malware Spyware Ransomware Trojans Viruses Worms Rootkits Bootkits Keyloggers Screen scrapers Exploits Backdoors Logic bombs Payloads Denial of service Defenses Computer access control Application security Antivirus software Secure coding Secure by default Secure by design Secure operating systems Authentication Multi-factor authentication Authorization Data-centric security Encryption Firewall Intrusion detection system Mobile secure gateway Runtime application self-protection (RASP) v t e Information security , sometimes shortened to InfoSec , is the practice of preventing unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, inspection, recording or destruction of information. Th
Read more

章鱼与海女图

Image
本条目 可参照英語維基百科相應條目来扩充 。 （2014/5/25） 若您熟悉来源语言和主题，请协助参考外语维基扩充条目。请勿直接提交机械翻译，也不要翻译不可靠、低品质内容。依版权协议，译文需在编辑摘要注明来源，或于讨论页顶部标记 {{Translated page}} 标签。 本条目 需要擴充。 （2013年8月15日） 请協助改善这篇條目，更進一步的信息可能會在討論頁或扩充请求中找到。请在擴充條目後將此模板移除。 《 章鱼与海女 》（日语： 蛸と海女 ／ たことあま   Tako to ama ）是一幅由日本畫家葛饰北斋创作的浮世绘，出自1814年（文化4年）出版的艳本《喜能会之故真通》（日语： 喜能会之故真通 ／ きのえのこまつ   Kinoe no Komatsu ）。畫中有兩隻章鱼以觸手攻擊一名採珠的海女，並進行擬似戀獸癖的交媾行為。作品尺寸为6½" × 8¾" （16.51 cm × 22.23 cm）。 [1] 在此之前的类似作品还有北尾重政的艳本《謡曲色番組》及勝川春潮的艳本《艳本千夜多女志》等，有被北斋作为参考的可能性。 《章鱼与海女图》有不同英文翻译，一般称The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife，又作Girl Diver and Octopi、Diver and Two Octopi，Richard Douglas Lane称其为 Girl Diver and Octopi [2] ，Mathi Forrer 称其为 Pearl Diver and Two Octopi [3] ，Danielle Talerico 称其为 Diver and Two Octopi 。 [4] 目录 1 作品介绍 1.1 画中对话 1.2 解释 2 评价 3 影响 3.1 模仿作品 4 另见 5 参考来源 6 外部連結 作品介绍 画中对话 原文 译文 大蛸： いつぞハいつぞハとねらいすましてゐたかいがあつて、けふといふけふ、とうとうとらまへたア。てもむつくりとしたいいぼぼだ。いもよりハなをこうぶつだ。サアサア、すつてすつてすいつくして
Read more

Farm Security Administration

Image
Farm Security Administration Farm Security Administration logo Agency overview Formed September 1, 1937  ( 1937-09-01 ) Preceding agencies Resettlement Administration Federal Emergency Relief Administration Dissolved 1946 Superseding agency Farmers Home Administration Key documents Farm Security Act Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act The Farm Security Administration ( FSA ) was a New Deal agency created in 1937 to combat rural poverty during the Great Depression in the United States. It succeeded the Resettlement Administration (1935–1937). [1] The FSA stressed "rural rehabilitation" efforts to improve the lifestyle of sharecroppers, tenants, very poor landowning farmers, and a program to purchase submarginal land owned by poor farmers and resettle them in group farms on land more suitable for efficient farming. Critics, including the Farm Bureau, strongly opposed the FSA as an experiment in collectivizing agriculture—that is, in bringing
Read more