2011 Hong Kong local elections




















2011 Hong Kong local elections







← 2007
6 November 2011
2015 →


All Elected Constituencies
412 (of the 507) seats in all 18 Districts Councils
Turnout 41.49% Increase2.66pp










































































































































































































 
First party
Second party
Third party
 

Tam Yiu-chung.jpg

Albert Ho 2014 cut.jpg

Liu Sung Lee.jpg
Leader

Tam Yiu-chung

Albert Ho

Bruce Liu
Party

DAB

Democratic

ADPL
Alliance

Pro-Beijing

Pan-democracy

Pan-democracy
Last election
115 seats, 25.73%
59 seats, 15.38%
17 seats, 4.60%
Seats won

136
47
15
Seat change

Increase16

Decrease3

Decrease2
Popular vote

282,119
205,716
45,453
Percentage

23.89%
17.42%
3.85%
Swing

Decrease1.84pp

Increase2.04pp

Decrease0.75pp

 
Fourth party
Fifth party
Sixth party
 


Cheng Yiu-tong.jpg

Miriam Lau Kin Yee.jpg
Leader

Ho Hau-cheung

Cheng Yiu-tong

Miriam Lau
Party

Civil Force

FTU

Liberal
Alliance

Pro-Beijing

Pro-Beijing

Pro-Beijing
Last election
18 seats, 2.71%
1 seat, 0.37%
14 seats, 4.39%
Seats won
15
11
9
Seat change

Decrease3

Increase7

Increase3
Popular vote
35,221
36,646
23,408
Percentage
2.98%
3.10%
1.98%
Swing

Increase0.27pp

Increase2.73pp

Decrease2.41pp

 
Seventh party
Eighth party
Ninth party
 

Gary Fan 2015 portrait.jpg

Alan Leong 2015.jpg

Leung Yiu-chung 2017.jpg
Leader

Gary Fan
and others

Alan Leong

Leung Yiu-chung
Party

Neo Democrats

Civic

NWSC
Alliance

Pan-democracy

Pan-democracy

Pan-democracy
Last election

New party
8 seats, 4.29%
4 seats, 1.10%
Seats won
8
7
5
Seat change
Steady
Decrease5

Increase2
Popular vote
25,437
47,603
14,364
Percentage
2.15%
4.03%
1.22%
Swing
N/A

Decrease0.26pp

Increase0.11pp




2011DCelectionmap.svg
Map of the winning party by constituency


The 2011 Hong Kong District Council elections were held on 6 November 2011. Elections were held to all 18 District Councils of Hong Kong, returning 412 members from directly elected constituencies, each selecting a council member.[1] After the government's constitutional reform package was passed in 2010, five new seats in the Legislative Council would be created in which the candidates would be nominated by all District Councillors.


The pro-Beijing camp continued its success in this election and controlled all 18 District Councils. The pro-Beijing flagship party Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB) remained the biggest winner by taking 136 seats, far ahead of the pan-democracy flagship party Democratic Party's 47 seats. The Democratic Party faced challenges from radical democratic party People Power which campaigned against the Democratic Party and Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood (ADPL) which supported the government's constitutional reform package in 2010. The People Power filled 62 candidates, most of them stood against the Democratic Party and ADPL candidates, including Democratic Party chairman Albert Ho and ADPL former chairman Frederick Fung.


Albert Ho and Frederick Fung were able to retain their seats, but other pan-democrat heavyweights who tried to gain seats in the District Councils in order to run in the new constituency in next year's Legislative Council election, including Tanya Chan, Ronny Tong and Lee Cheuk-yan, lost their bids to relatively unknown local councillors.




Contents






  • 1 Background


  • 2 Pre-election controversies


    • 2.1 Political donations


    • 2.2 Foreign domestic workers right of abode issues




  • 3 Results


    • 3.1 Results by district


    • 3.2 Vote summary


    • 3.3 Seat summary




  • 4 Post-election issues


  • 5 References


  • 6 External links





Background



The pro-democracy camp had been urging for universal suffrage for decades. In 2005, a constitutional reform package was carried out by Donald Tsang, the Chief Executive. However, it was voted down by the pan-democrats as it did not state a clear timetable or road map to achieve an ultimate universal suffrage.


On 29 December 2007, the NPCSC (China's Standing Committee of the National People's Congress) announced that the Chief Executive and all members of Legislative Council may be selected by universal suffrage in 2017 and 2020 respectively. The statement by Beijing was unclear and it implied the term "universal suffrage" may be defined by the Central Government.


Afterward, Donald Tsang carried out another reform package in 2009. While the Civic Party and the League of Social Democrats councilors resigned from Legislative Council in order to launch a de facto referendum against the package and urging for real universal suffrage, their ally, the Democratic Party went for negotiation with the mainland officials and carried out a revised proposal. On 24–25 June 2010, the revised package was passed through the Legislative Council. It brought out a major split within the pan-democracy camp. A new radical party, People Power led by Wong Yuk-man and Albert Chan was announced to punish those who betrayal the cause of democracy.[2] The People Power sent total number of 62 candidates into the election, most of them chose to contest with the Democratic Party and ADPL candidates.


According to the new reform package, general public are allowed to elect district council members into LegCo from the new five-seat district council functional constituency following their nomination within the councillors in the 2012 election. District councils election thus become a new battlefield for the new five seats of LegCo in which many heavyweights chose to run for a seat for the super seats of LegCo including Chan Yuen-han, Ronny Tong and Lee Cheuk-yan.



Pre-election controversies



Political donations


Just one month before the election in October 2011, a leaked document revealed that Jimmy Lai, media mogul of Apple Daily has long been donating money to many supporters of democracy groups.[3] For example, the Democratic Party received HK$13,690,000 from 2006 to 2010. While the Civic Party received HK$14,566,500 for the same period.[3] Democracy supporter Catholic Cardinal Joseph Zen was also seen receiving more than HK$20 million,[3] and the radical League of Social Democrats received HK$1 million last year. Former chief secretary Anson Chan received HK$1.3 million from 2007 to 2009.[3] According to Sina.com Lai was said to have donated about $10 million to democracy camp groups in a 5-year span.[4] The Wall Street Journal saw this as part of "a fresh campaign to accuse pro-democracy politicians of being stooges of foreign powers".[5]


Since 2009–2010 the top four political parties received a total of $70 million in donations.[6] Pro-establishment political groups are known to receive handsome political donations from many prominent Hong Kong businessmen. Out of that sum more than half ($48,370,000) went to the DAB. This amount was also 2.5 times more than the next pro-Beijing camp, Liberal Party as well as 7 times more than the sum received by pro-democracy camp groups like Civic Party and Democratic party.[6] The DAB received eight times the amount as the Democratic Party in 2009-10.[5]


However, there is a serious shortage of people donating to the democracy camp parties. Other than Lai, there seems to be nobody else in HK donating to the democracy camps any more.[6] According to Emily Lau, first there is definitely a question of transparency with regards to who is donating money.[6] There is also the issue of revealing donors. The WSJ believed that the taboo on discussing the activities of the Communist Party of China implies the Hong Kong government will never pass a law governing political parties. It added: "As a result, donor transparency will never be mandated."[5] The Communist Party of China bans and punishes people once they know who is donating to democracy camps.[6] In this election, the well-financed pro-Beijing parties swept the polls.[7]



Foreign domestic workers right of abode issues


Right of abode for foreign domestic workers in HK became an election issue as the Civic Party was closely identified with the legal advisers who represented one such Filipina.[8] The court case Vallejos v. Commissioner of Registration was one of the primary case in 2011. Pro-Beijing DAB argued that 125,000 workers were eligible, and would cause unemployment in Hong Kong to rise from 3.5% to between 7 and 10%.[9] The Pan-Democrats, particularly the Civic Party, were disadvantaged by this as many HK residents fear granting Filipinos permanent residency will affect them.[10]



Results



A post-handover record of 1.2 million voters cast their ballots. The pro-Beijing DAB secured the most seats. Albert Ho held his seat, but many other pro-democracy camp heavyweights lost their seat including Tanya Chan, Ronny Tong and Lee Cheuk-yan.[11]Democratic Party vice chairman Sin Chung-kai admitted that this was "a warning to the pro-democracy camp".[7]














































































































































































































































































































e • d Summary of the 6 November 2011 District Councils of Hong Kong election results
Political Affiliation
Popular vote
%

Standing
Elected
±



Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong
282,119 23.89
Decrease1.84
182 136
Increase16


Civil Force
35,221 2.98
Increase0.27
20 15
Decrease3


Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions
36,646 3.10
Increase2.73
20 11
Increase7


Liberal Party
23,408 1.98
Decrease2.41
24 9
Increase3


New People's Party
15,568 1.32 - 12 4
Increase3


New Territories Association of Societies
2,187 0.19 - 2 2
Increase1


Economic Synergy
2,404 0.20 - 3 1
Increase1

Fu Cheong Estate Residents Association
2,235 0.19 - 1 1
Increase1


Federation of Hong Kong and Kowloon Labour Unions
1,859 0.16
Increase0.04
2 1
Steady0

Pro-Beijing Independents
252,720 21.40 - 172 121
Decrease3
Total for pro-Beijing camp 654,368 55.42 Increase1.77 438 301
Increase23



Democratic Party
205,716 17.42
Increase2.04
132 47
Decrease3


Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood
45,453 3.85
Decrease0.75
26 15
Decrease2


Neo Democrats
25,437 2.15 - 10 8
Steady0


Civic Party
47,603 4.03
Decrease0.26
41 7
Decrease5


Neighbourhood and Worker's Service Centre
14,364 1.22
Increase0.11
6 5
Increase2


Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions
4,044 0.34
Increase0.14
3 0
Steady0


Power for Democracy
3,837 0.32 - 4 0
Steady0

Individuals
23,007 1.95
Decrease2.33
14 6
Decrease1
Total for Democratic Coalition for DC Election 369,461 31.29 Decrease3.60 236 88
Decrease9


People Power
23,465 1.99 - 62 1
Decrease1


League of Social Democrats
21,833 1.85
Decrease0.66
28 0
Decrease5


Land Justice League
3,025 0.26 - 4 0
Steady0


Citizens' Radio
1,718 0.15 - 2 0
Steady0

Independent democrats and others
45,015 3.81 - 37 14
Decrease3
Total for pan-democracy camp 464,512 39.34 Increase0.18 369 103
Decrease16

Independent and others
61,930 5.24 Decrease1.96 108 8
Increase2

Total vaild votes

1,180,809

100.0

-

915

412

Increase7

Invaild votes

21,497


Total (turnout 41.49%)

1,202,544




Results by district




















































































































































































































































































































































































































































Council
Previous
control
Previous
party
Camp
control
Largest
party
DAB DP CF ADPL FTU Lib Civ Others Pro-dem Pro-Beijing Appointed
& ex officio
Composition Details

Central & Western

Pro-Beijing


Democratic

Pro-Beijing


DAB

5
4



1

5
4

11
3














Details

Wan Chai
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

3






2
2

9
2














Details

Eastern
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

16
2


1
2
3
13
6

30
6













Details

Southern
Pro-Beijing


Democratic
Pro-Beijing


Democratic
2

5



1
1
8
6

11
3














Details

Yau Tsim Mong
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

8
1





8
2

15
3














Details

Sham Shui Po
NOC


ADPL
Pro-Beijing


ADPL
4



7



10
7

14
3














Details

Kowloon City
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

7
1

4

1

9
5

17
3














Details

Wong Tai Sin
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

9
3

2
1
1

9
9

16
4














Details

Kwun Tong
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

12
2


1


20
6

28
5













Details

Tsuen Wan
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

4
1


1

2
9
4

13
3+2














Details

Tuen Mun
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

12
7

2



8
9

20
5+1














Details

Yuen Long
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

7
3


2
2

17
5

26
5+6














Details

North
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB (majority)

14
1





2
1

16
3+4














Details

Tai Po
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

8
1





10
3

16
3+2














Details

Sai Kung
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

7
2
3

2


10
9

15
3+2














Details

Sha Tin
Pro-Beijing


Civil Force
Pro-Beijing


Civil Force
9
5

12


1

11
8

28
6+1














Details

Kwai Tsing
Pro-Beijing


Democratic
Pro-Beijing


Democratic
5

9


2


13

15
13
5+1













Details

Islands
Pro-Beijing


DAB
Pro-Beijing


DAB

4



1

1
1
4

9
3+8














Details
TOTAL

136

47

15

15

11

9

7

168

102

307

95















Vote summary











Votes, of total, by camp



  Pro-Beijing (55.42%)


  Pan-democrats (39.34%)


  Other (5.24%)












Seats, of total, by camp



  Pro-Beijing (73.06%)


  Pan-democrats (25.00%)


  Other (1.94%)















































































Popular vote
DAB
23.89%
Democratic
17.42%
Civic
4.03%
ADPL
3.85%
FTU
3.10%
Civil Force
2.98%
Neo Democrats
2.15%
People Power
1.99%
Liberal
1.98%
LSD
1.85%
NPP
1.32%
NWSC
1.22%
Others
34.22%




Seat summary































































Seats
DAB
33.01%
Democratic
11.41%
ADPL
3.64%
Civil Force
3.64%
FTU
2.67%
Liberal
2.18%
Neo Democrats
1.94%
Civic
1.70%
NWSC
1.21%
Others
38.60%




Post-election issues


Following the election, pan-democrats complained of irregularities in voter registration records, and a number of candidates who lost in marginal seats made allegations of electoral fraud to the police. The government was criticised for failing to address the issue back in 2006 after alleged instances where multiple voters had registered under a same address surfaced. In defence, Chief Secretary Stephen Lam said that the matter was "investigated thoroughly five years ago", and that "no evidence of vote rigging were found".[12] The police received 16 such complaints in 2011.[13]


Among the irregularities alleged was that almost 100 voters in Central used registered offices and hotels as their home addresses.[13] Democratic Party candidate, Winfield Chong, who lost by 24 votes, said six buildings in the Sai Wan constituency used by approximately 120 voters to register were either being demolished or had been demolished; Yeung Sui-yin, who lost the Belcher seat by 33 votes, filed a complaint with the police, also alleging ballot rigging.[12][13]


ADPL candidate Lam Kin-man, who lost King's Park constituency by two votes, took up his complaint with the ICAC. Lam alleged that, for example, five registered voters at one flat in the constituency where he was candidate all had different surnames; none of the voters registered at seven flats were present or past owners.[12][13] two units said to have been used for storage purposes each had 10 registered voters.[14] Following up on the allegations, the ICAC mounted "Operation Wave Spray", according to which 22 suspects were found to have "provided false information about their residential addresses to election officers"; six of them were charged.[15]



References





  1. ^ "412 elected District Council members". Info.gov.hk. 7 November 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2011..mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/12px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}


  2. ^ "A league torn apart". The Standard. Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 4 September 2014. Retrieved 20 November 2011.


  3. ^ abcd South China morning post. Lai hits back over donations furore . 19 Oct 2011.


  4. ^ "民建聯指捐款多或影響決策 – 新浪網 – 新聞". News.sina.com.hk. Archived from the original on 20 November 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2011.


  5. ^ abc "Black Hands' in Hong Kong", pg 16, The Wall Street Journal. December 5, 2011.


  6. ^ abcde "4大黨收獻金 年逾7000萬". worldjournal.com. 19 October 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2011.


  7. ^ ab Woo, Joyce (7 November 2011). "Pro-Beijing parties sweep Hong Kong district polls". yahoo!. AFP. Archived from the original on 5 December 2011.


  8. ^ Dioquino, Rose-An Jessica (8 November 2011). "Pro-domestic workers candidates lose in HK polls". GMA Network. Archived on 5 December 2011


  9. ^ "Hong Kong: 'World City' or Racist?". Jakarta Globe. Archived from the original on 18 November 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2011.


  10. ^ "HK Pro-Democracy Parties to Review Strategy After Election Defeats". VOA News. Retrieved 20 November 2011.


  11. ^ "Pro-Beijing Parties Sweep Hong Kong District Polls". Jakarta Globe. Archived from the original on 4 February 2013. Retrieved 20 November 2011.


  12. ^ abc Lee, Samson (29 November 2011) "Past haunts Lam on election fraud", The Standard. Retrieved 5 December 2011.


  13. ^ abcd Lee, Colleen; Chong, Tanna; Lau, Stuart (29 November 2011). "Voter listed Four Seasons hotel as a home". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 5 December 2011.


  14. ^ Vote-rigging complaint by candidate RTHK. 29 November 2011. Archived 5 December 2011.


  15. ^ "ICAC detains 22 in vote-rigging probe". RTHK. 5 December 2011. Archived 5 December 2011.




External links






  • 2011 District Councils Election Official website









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Information security

Lambak Kiri

章鱼与海女图